home
***
CD-ROM
|
disk
|
FTP
|
other
***
search
/
Columbia Kermit
/
kermit.zip
/
bench
/
x.txt
/
000176_deja@alienbigcats.com_Thu Nov 29 14:06:19 EST 2001.msg
< prev
next >
Wrap
Text File
|
2020-01-01
|
2KB
|
52 lines
Article: 13000 of comp.protocols.kermit.misc
Path: newsmaster.cc.columbia.edu!panix!newsxfer.eecs.umich.edu!news-spur1.maxwell.syr.edu!news.maxwell.syr.edu!newsfeed.stanford.edu!postnews1.google.com!not-for-mail
From: deja@alienbigcats.com (paul wells)
Newsgroups: comp.protocols.kermit.misc
Subject: Re: Counting the files sent and received
Date: 29 Nov 2001 09:49:17 -0800
Organization: http://groups.google.com/
Lines: 33
Message-ID: <669ac511.0111290949.328fb177@posting.google.com>
References: <669ac511.0111281348.1ae59f62@posting.google.com> <9u3mn1$g71$1@newsmaster.cc.columbia.edu>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 206.81.198.130
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Trace: posting.google.com 1007056157 32702 127.0.0.1 (29 Nov 2001 17:49:17 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
NNTP-Posting-Date: 29 Nov 2001 17:49:17 GMT
Xref: newsmaster.cc.columbia.edu comp.protocols.kermit.misc:13000
fdc@watsun.cc.columbia.edu (Frank da Cruz) wrote in message news:<9u3mn1$g71$1@newsmaster.cc.columbia.edu>...
> In article <669ac511.0111281348.1ae59f62@posting.google.com>,
> paul wells <deja@alienbigcats.com> wrote:
> : Is there any [straight-forward and simple] way to count the number of
> : files transmitted using SEND and RECEIVE?
> :
> : It's not a real problem as a call to Kermit is only part of the
> : application I'm writing, and the file validation etc will be handled
> : elsewhere. But you know how it is when you think of something, then
> : spend far too much time trying to do it.
> :
> In C-Kermit or K95 of recent vintage, after each file-transfer operation
> (SEND, GET, RECEIVE, etc) the variable \v(filenumber) shows the number
> of files that were transferred, whether each transfer succeeded or not.
> There are currently no variables that break down the number of files
> successfully transferred, rejected, skipped, interrupted, or that had
> fatal errors.
>
> Meanwhile, in case you're interested in other approaches to the same
> problem, you might want to look at:
>
> http://www.columbia.edu/kermit/case10.html
>
> and:
>
> http://www.columbia.edu/kermit/ftpscripts.html
>
> both of which deal with "atomic file movement", validation of successful
> transfer, and the like.
>
Excellent - thanks for that Frank; of course now I'm going to spend
all day playing with Kermit trying these ideas out and not get
anything done on the thing I'm supposed to be doing :)